What conclusion does the logical problem of evil attempt to

The existence of evil logically rules out the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, supremely good being.There are currently differing definitions of these concepts.Start studying logical problem of evil.They attempt to show that the assumed propositions lead to a logical contradiction and therefore cannot all be correct.The evidential problem of evil.P1 there is a being who possesses omnipotence and perfect goodness.

The deductive, a priori version of the problem.Oup 1982) the theist accepts a group or set of three propositions;A) show god's existence is logically compatible with evil b) show evil is not evidence against the existence of god.God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and evil exists, are inconsistent.P2 a perfectly good being wishes to remove evil and an omnipotent being possess the power to do whatever it wishes.Apol 620_module 3_the logical problem of evil 1 welcome to this video in which we want to

The evidential problem of evil is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil (or certain instances, kinds, quantities, or distributions of evil) constitutes evidence against the existence of god, that is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness.evidential arguments from evil attempt to show that, once we.There is a logical possibility that evil and a perfect god exist together, but the evidence is against that possibility actually being true.(we could easily imagine a better one.) therefore:The logical challenge can and has been answered decisively, starting with alvin plantinga in his famous book, god, freedom, and evil.William rowe's evidential problem of evil argument that argues because there a many instances of pointless suffering it is unlikely a god exists.